Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cowles v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Landis Allen Cowles filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical staff alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Cowles appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Cowles' complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-02-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7796

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Landis Allen Cowles filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical staff alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Cowles appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Cowles' complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Cowles v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Landis Allen Cowles filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical staff alleging violations of his civil rights. The district court denied relief and Cowles appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials before the court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Cowles' complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7796

    LANDIS ALLEN COWLES,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    G. HARRIS, Registered Nurse, Head Nurse;
    DOCTOR KAZLAUSKAS, MD, Unit Physician; L.
    HOUSE, L.P.N.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (1:06-cv-00920-LMB)

    Submitted: January 25, 2007

    Decided:

    February 1, 2007

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Landis Allen Cowles, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Landis Allen Cowles appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Cowles v.

    Harris, No. 1:06-cv-00920-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 10, 2006,


    entered Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like