Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Debrew, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Nathan D. Debrew of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 1, 1996 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7303

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Nathan D. Debrew of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 1, 1996 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Debrew, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Nathan D. Debrew of the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 1, 1996 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7303

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    NATHAN D. DEBREW,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CR-94-156, CA-95-412)
    Submitted:

    February 13, 1997

    Decided:

    February 26, 1997

    Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nathan D. Debrew, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
    judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Debrew, Nos. CR-94-156; CA-95-412 (M.D.N.C.
    Aug. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like