Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robert Clifton Johnson, Jr. v. Myles R. Eisenstein, 902 F.2d 1565, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Robert Clifton Johnson Jr. of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-05-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 902 F.2d 1565 Docket: 89-6869

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Robert Clifton Johnson Jr. of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Robert Clifton Johnson, Jr. v. Myles R. Eisenstein, 902 F.2d 1565, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Robert Clifton Johnson Jr. of a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    902 F.

    2d 1565
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Robert Clifton JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Myles R. EISENSTEIN, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 89-6869.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 30, 1989.
    Decided April 26, 1990.
    Rehearing Denied May 22, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-2651-N)
    Robert Clifton Johnson, Jr., appellant pro se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Robert Clifton Johnson, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Eisenstein, C/A No. 892651-N (D.Md. Sept. 27, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.


    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like