Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Lappin, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Michael Williams filed a Bivens complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not find adequate grounds to overturn the determination that Williams did not demonstrate a valid legal claim against the prison officials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7813

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Williams filed a Bivens complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not find adequate grounds to overturn the determination that Williams did not demonstrate a valid legal claim against the prison officials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Williams v. Lappin, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Williams filed a Bivens complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court did not find adequate grounds to overturn the determination that Williams did not demonstrate a valid legal claim against the prison officials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7813

    MICHAEL J. WILLIAMS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    HARLEY G. LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; B. G.
    JERRY JONES; OFFICER STRICKLAND;
    STORY; G. COOPER; OFFICER GIDDINS;
    MOLLICA;
    JESSICA
    JONES;
    OFFICER
    OFFICER BOURQUE; C/O FLANARY; OFFICER
    OFFICER ELDRIDGE; OFFICER MARQUES;
    WATTS,

    COMPTON;
    OFFICER
    OFFICER
    TORRES;
    JOHNSON;
    HARRELL
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-04-625-7)

    Submitted:

    March 28, 2005

    Decided:

    April 29, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael J. Williams appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his Bivens* complaint.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Williams v. Lappin,

    No. CA-04-625-7 (W.D. Va. filed Oct. 26, 2004; entered Oct. 27,
    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named


    Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    - 2 -

    Agents

    of

    Fed.

    Bureau

    of

    You might also like