Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Freddy L. Wambach v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr. Gary Dixon Doctor Shah Ms. Lowney, 104 F.3d 360, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Freddy Wambach, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 104 F.3d 360 Docket: 96-7247

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Freddy Wambach, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    Freddy L. Wambach v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr. Gary Dixon Doctor Shah Ms. Lowney, 104 F.3d 360, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Freddy Wambach, a North Carolina inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court, which had denied the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    104 F.

    3d 360

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Freddy L. WAMBACH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Charles M. CREECY, Jr.; Gary Dixon; Doctor Shah; Ms.
    Lowney, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-7247.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 10, 1996.
    Decided Dec. 24, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-545-BR)
    Freddy L. Wambach, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    DISMISSED.
    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d)
    (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110
    Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
    and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. Wambach v. Creecy, No. CA-96-545-BR

    (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like