Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Yao v. Visa Inc., 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Visa Inc. in a case brought by Xiaoping Yao alleging discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It declined to hear oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court thus affirmed the lower court's decision dismissing Yao's discrimination claim against his former employer Visa Inc.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-03-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 092342

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Visa Inc. in a case brought by Xiaoping Yao alleging discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It declined to hear oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court thus affirmed the lower court's decision dismissing Yao's discrimination claim against his former employer Visa Inc.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Yao v. Visa Inc., 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Visa Inc. in a case brought by Xiaoping Yao alleging discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It declined to hear oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials. The court thus affirmed the lower court's decision dismissing Yao's discrimination claim against his former employer Visa Inc.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-2342

    XIAOPING YAO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    VISA INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Liam OGrady, District
    Judge. (1:08-cv-01181-LO-TCB)

    Submitted:

    March 16, 2010

    Decided:

    March 19, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Xiaoping Yao, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Anne Goetzl, Lindsey


    Hager
    McGinnis,
    LITTLER
    MENDELSON,
    Washington,
    D.C.,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Xiaoping

    Yao

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Visa


    Inc., and dismissing his claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e2000e-17

    (2006).

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    Yao v. Visa Inc., No. 1:08-cv-01181-LO-

    TCB (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2009)

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like