Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alfonzo Faulk v. Dwight D. High Dentist Ray Watson Sargeant Draughmon Barnes Warden Dixon Robert Camper, 7 F.3d 223, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    Alfonzo Faulk appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in his case against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit judges agreed with the reasoning of the district court in denying Faulk's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the prior judgment in the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-09-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 7 F.3d 223 Docket: 93-6504

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Alfonzo Faulk appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in his case against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit judges agreed with the reasoning of the district court in denying Faulk's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the prior judgment in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views2 pages

    Alfonzo Faulk v. Dwight D. High Dentist Ray Watson Sargeant Draughmon Barnes Warden Dixon Robert Camper, 7 F.3d 223, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Alfonzo Faulk appealed the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in his case against several prison officials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit judges agreed with the reasoning of the district court in denying Faulk's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the prior judgment in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    7 F.

    3d 223

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Alfonzo FAULK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Dwight D. HIGH; Dentist Ray; Watson; Sargeant Draughmon;
    Barnes; Warden Dixon; Robert Camper,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 93-6504.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: August 27, 1993.
    Decided: September 20, 1993.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-89115)
    Alfonzo Faulk, Appellant Pro Se.
    Ronna Dawn Gibbs, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION

    Alfonzo Faulk appeals from the district court's order denying Faulk's motion
    seeking relief from the court's prior judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).
    Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this
    appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Faulk v. High, No. CA-89-115 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1993). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like