Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Timothy Autry under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found Autry's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. It dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-09-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 887 F.2d 1078 Docket: 88-6785

    Original Title

    Timothy Carness Autry v. Sgt. Richardson C.B. Hayslett Officer Monk Officer Mayberry Gary Dixon D.L. Alford B.A. Hoffner Officer Hart, 887 F.2d 1078, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Timothy Autry under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found Autry's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. It dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Timothy Autry under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit found Autry's appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. It dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    887 F.

    2d 1078
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Timothy Carness AUTRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Sgt. RICHARDSON; C.B. Hayslett; Officer Monk; Officer
    Mayberry; Gary Dixon; D.L. Alford; B.A.
    Hoffner; Officer Hart, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-6785.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Aug. 10, 1989.
    Decided: Sept. 20, 1989.

    Timothy Carness Autry, appellant pro se.


    Howard Edwin Hill (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina),
    for appellees.
    Before HARRISON L. WINTER, DONALD RUSSELL and
    MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Timothy Carness Autry appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Autry v. Richardson, CA-87-1036-CRT
    (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like