Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Virgil Lee Robey Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the Virginia Department of Corrections and medical staff at Powhatan Correctional Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Robey.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-10-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 887 F.2d 1081 Docket: 89-7551

    Original Title

    Virgil Lee Robey, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections G.P. Dodson, Superintendent 11 C.G. Feldman, Assistant Superintendent 11 Dental Department, Powhatan Correctional Center Judy Armentrout, R.N. Unit 11 L v. Young, C.O. Unit 11 W.R. Rogers Doctor Robinson, Unit Doctor 11, 887 F.2d 1081, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Virgil Lee Robey Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the Virginia Department of Corrections and medical staff at Powhatan Correctional Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Robey.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Virgil Lee Robey Jr. appealed the district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the Virginia Department of Corrections and medical staff at Powhatan Correctional Center. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, and oral arguments would not aid their decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Robey.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    887 F.

    2d 1081
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Virgil Lee ROBEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
    CORRECTIONS; G.P.
    Dodson, Superintendent # 11; C.G. Feldman, Assistant
    Superintendent # 11; Dental Department, Powhatan
    Correctional Center; Judy Armentrout, R.N. Unit # 11; L.V.
    Young, C.O. Unit # 11; W.R. Rogers; Doctor Robinson, Unit
    Doctor # 11, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7551.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 26, 1989.
    Decided: Oct. 3, 1989.

    Virgil Lee Robey, Jr., appellant pro se.


    Robert Harkness Herring, Jr. (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia),
    Edward Meade Macon (McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe), for appellees.
    Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Virgil Lee Robey, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Robey v. Commonwealth of Virginia

    Department of Corrections, C/A No. 88-339-R (E.D.Va. Nov. 18, 1988 and
    Feb. 1, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like