Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Owens v. Stieneke, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Adam Wade Owens filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Owens appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Owens' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-01-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6912

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Adam Wade Owens filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Owens appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Owens' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Owens v. Stieneke, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Adam Wade Owens filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Owens appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error in the lower court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Owens' complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6912

    ADAM WADE OWENS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DANIEL STIENEKE; T. SHAW, Correctional Officer; SUPERINTENDENT MCDADE; SERGEANT WARREN;
    SERGEANT HENRY WILLIAMS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-99-354-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2000

    Decided:

    January 8, 2001

    Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Adam Wade Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy Powers, NORTH CAROLINA
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Adam Wade Owens appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Owens v. Stieneke, No. CA-99-354-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 25, 2000).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like