Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dehoney v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Michael F. Dehoney on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6640

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Michael F. Dehoney on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Dehoney v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Michael F. Dehoney on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6640

    MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, South Carolina Department of
    Corrections
    Director;
    CHARLIE
    J.
    CEPAK,
    Warden; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-96-1356-4-21BE)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 1998

    Decided:

    October 15, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se.
    Larry Cleveland Batson,
    Robert Eric Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald
    Roberts, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael F. Dehoney appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Dehoney v. Moore, No. CA-96-1356-4-21BE (D.S.C. March 26, 1998). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like