Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Green v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    George Samuel Green, Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion denying relief to Green. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented such that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-06-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6111

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Samuel Green, Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion denying relief to Green. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented such that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Green v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Samuel Green, Jr. filed a § 1983 complaint against several Virginia Department of Corrections officials alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion denying relief to Green. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented such that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6111

    GEORGE SAMUEL GREEN, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RON ANGELONE, Director of Department of Corrections; DOCTOR FAHEY, C.M.S. Mental/Program
    Director; FRED SHILLING, Health/Service Director; C. WILLIAMS, CMS Medical Administrator;
    D. GARRATHY, Warden of Greensville Correctional Center; JOHN B. TAYLOR, Warden of Sussex I
    Prison; DOCTOR CESSEN, Mental Health Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-99-137-2)

    Submitted:

    May 25, 2000

    Decided:

    June 5, 2000

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    George Samuel Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    George Samuel Green, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the

    reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Angelone, No. CA-99137-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like