Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Welker, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Corey Elmo Welker's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment and entry of garnishment. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7048

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Corey Elmo Welker's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment and entry of garnishment. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Welker, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Corey Elmo Welker's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment and entry of garnishment. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the lower court's reasoning. The appeals court also decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7048

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    COREY ELMO WELKER,
    Defendant - Appellant,
    THE ESTATE OF LORIN J. WELKER, A/K/A LORIN J.
    WELKER,
    Garnishee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge.
    (CR-00-76)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2001

    Decided:

    December 3, 2001

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Corey Elmo Welker, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Corey Elmo Welker appeals the district courts orders denying
    his motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment and entering garnishment.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts orders

    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-

    soning of the district court.

    United States v. Welker, No. CR-00-

    76 (E.D. Va. May 30 & June 5, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like