Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hendricks v. Reed, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Terry Hendricks, a Virginia inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The unpublished opinion states it is not binding precedent and oral arguments were not needed because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-8023

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Terry Hendricks, a Virginia inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The unpublished opinion states it is not binding precedent and oral arguments were not needed because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Hendricks v. Reed, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terry Hendricks, a Virginia inmate, appealed the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The unpublished opinion states it is not binding precedent and oral arguments were not needed because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-8023

    TERRY A. HENDRICKS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    B. THOMAS REED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CA-01-819-2)

    Submitted:

    February 14, 2002

    Decided:

    February 27, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Terry A. Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Terry A. Hendricks, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp.
    2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 2000).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

    on the reasoning of the district court.


    CA-01-819-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2001).
    ment

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    See Hendricks v. Reed, No.


    We dispense with oral argu-

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like