Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carlon Edward Pittman v. James H. Snodgrass, Facility Director (Unit 22), James A. Smith, JR., Regional Administrator, 883 F.2d 69, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views1 page
    Carlon Edward Pittman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that was dismissed by the district court for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice, as the district court had properly followed the procedures of Evans v. Croom for in forma pauperis filings and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit decided the issues without oral argument as they had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-08-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 883 F.2d 69 Docket: 89-7542

    Original Title

    Carlon Edward Pittman v. James H. Snodgrass, Facility Director (Unit 22), James A. Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, 883 F.2d 69, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carlon Edward Pittman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that was dismissed by the district court for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice, as the district court had properly followed the procedures of Evans v. Croom for in forma pauperis filings and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit decided the issues without oral argument as they had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views1 page

    Carlon Edward Pittman v. James H. Snodgrass, Facility Director (Unit 22), James A. Smith, JR., Regional Administrator, 883 F.2d 69, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carlon Edward Pittman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that was dismissed by the district court for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice, as the district court had properly followed the procedures of Evans v. Croom for in forma pauperis filings and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit decided the issues without oral argument as they had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    883 F.

    2d 69
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Carlon Edward PITTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    James H. SNODGRASS, Facility Director (Unit 22), James A.
    Smith, Jr., Regional Administrator, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7542.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 28, 1989.
    Decided Aug. 8, 1989.

    Carlon Edward Pittman, appellant pro se.


    Before WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Carlon Edward Pittman appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the
    district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v.
    Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and
    did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we affirm
    the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the
    dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like