Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ernest Edward Shaw v. Edward W. Murray, Director Attorney General of Virginia, 809 F.2d 786, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner, Ernest Edward Shaw, seeking habeas corpus relief. A magistrate had previously refused Shaw's habeas petition. The three judge panel reviewed the record and magistrate's opinion and found no merit to an appeal. The panel denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dismissed the appeal, and relied on the reasoning provided by the magistrate in its earlier decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-01-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 809 F.2d 786 Docket: 86-6780

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner, Ernest Edward Shaw, seeking habeas corpus relief. A magistrate had previously refused Shaw's habeas petition. The three judge panel reviewed the record and magistrate's opinion and found no merit to an appeal. The panel denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dismissed the appeal, and relied on the reasoning provided by the magistrate in its earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    Ernest Edward Shaw v. Edward W. Murray, Director Attorney General of Virginia, 809 F.2d 786, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petitioner, Ernest Edward Shaw, seeking habeas corpus relief. A magistrate had previously refused Shaw's habeas petition. The three judge panel reviewed the record and magistrate's opinion and found no merit to an appeal. The panel denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dismissed the appeal, and relied on the reasoning provided by the magistrate in its earlier decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    809 F.

    2d 786
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ernest Edward SHAW, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, Director; Attorney General of Virginia,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 86-6780.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 28, 1986.
    Decided Jan. 9, 1987.

    Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.


    Ernest Edward Shaw, appellant pro se.
    Richard B. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from his order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal,
    dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    magistrate. Shaw v. Murray, C/A No. 86-356-R (E.D.Va., Sept. 18, 1986).

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like