Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Harold J. Southall filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at Roxbury Correctional Institution. The district court denied relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Southall's appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-01-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 953 F.2d 639 Docket: 91-6637

    Original Title

    Harold J. Southall v. Patrick Kemmerer, Sergeant, Roxbury Correctional Institution Robert Haines, Correctional Officer, Roxbury Correctional Institution David Rizer, Correctional Officer, Roxbury Correctional Institution Michael Swickard, Correctional Officer, Roxbury Correctional Institution Tyrone Haines, Hearing Officer Steven Baker, Lieutenant, Roxbury Correctional Institution Jon Galley, Warden, Roxbury Correctional Institution, 953 F.2d 639, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Harold J. Southall filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at Roxbury Correctional Institution. The district court denied relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Southall's appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Harold J. Southall filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at Roxbury Correctional Institution. The district court denied relief and accepted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Southall's appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    953 F.

    2d 639

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Harold J. SOUTHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Patrick KEMMERER, Sergeant, Roxbury Correctional
    Institution; Robert Haines, Correctional Officer, Roxbury
    Correctional Institution; David Rizer, Correctional
    Officer, Roxbury Correctional Institution; Michael
    Swickard, Correctional Officer, Roxbury Correctional
    Institution; Tyrone Haines, Hearing Officer; Steven Baker,
    Lieutenant, Roxbury Correctional Institution; Jon Galley,
    Warden, Roxbury Correctional Institution, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 91-6637.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Dec. 20, 1991.
    Decided Jan. 17, 1992.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore, No. CA-90-2017-WN, William M. Nickerson, District
    Judge.
    Harold J. Southall, appellant pro se.
    Timothy James Paulus, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for
    appellees.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.

    Before PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,


    Senior Circuit Judge.
    OPINION
    PER CURIAM:

    Harold J. Southall appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal
    is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Southall v. Kemmerer, No. CA-90-2017-WN (D.Md. July 10, 1991). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like