Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brown v. Division of Social, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's denial of relief on Robert Lee Brown's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Division of Social Services in Lynchburg, Virginia. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for denying relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2022

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's denial of relief on Robert Lee Brown's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Division of Social Services in Lynchburg, Virginia. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for denying relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Brown v. Division of Social, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's denial of relief on Robert Lee Brown's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Division of Social Services in Lynchburg, Virginia. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the magistrate judge's reasoning for denying relief. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2022

    ROBERT LEE BROWN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, City of Lynchburg, Virginia,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate
    Judge. (CA-94-68-L)
    Submitted:

    December 14, 1995

    Decided:

    January 24, 1996

    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Richard Lingafelt,
    GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN & DARBY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Brown v. Division of Social Servs., No. CA-94-68-L
    (W.D. Va. May 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    Judgment was entered by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28


    U.S.C.A. 636(c) (West 1993).
    2

    You might also like