Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Alberto Espinosa, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2009. It states that Alberto Espinosa appealed a district court order denying his motion to unseal documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided. It issued a ruling to affirm the lower court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7252A

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2009. It states that Alberto Espinosa appealed a district court order denying his motion to unseal documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided. It issued a ruling to affirm the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Alberto Espinosa, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 2009. It states that Alberto Espinosa appealed a district court order denying his motion to unseal documents. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided. It issued a ruling to affirm the lower court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7252

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ALBERTO ESPINOSA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Alexander Williams, Jr., District
    Judge. (8:97-cr-00343-AW-13)

    Submitted:

    June 17, 2011

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    KING,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    August 12, 2011

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alberto Espinosa, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alberto

    Espinosa

    appeals

    the

    denying his motion to unseal documents.


    record and find no reversible error.

    district

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Espinosa, No. 8:97-cr-00343-AW-13 (D. Md. June 11, 2009).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like