Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Emery Harold Hall, 51 F.3d 269, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes that Emery Harold Hall, the appellant, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that the motion was untimely filed as a Rule 35 motion, and that it lacked merit as a Section 3582(c)(2) motion because no relevant sentencing guideline had been reduced.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-03-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 51 F.3d 269 Docket: 94-6444

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes that Emery Harold Hall, the appellant, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that the motion was untimely filed as a Rule 35 motion, and that it lacked merit as a Section 3582(c)(2) motion because no relevant sentencing guideline had been reduced.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    United States v. Emery Harold Hall, 51 F.3d 269, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes that Emery Harold Hall, the appellant, appealed the district court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that the motion was untimely filed as a Rule 35 motion, and that it lacked merit as a Section 3582(c)(2) motion because no relevant sentencing guideline had been reduced.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    51 F.

    3d 269

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Emery Harold HALL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 94-6444.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
    Decided Mar. 27, 1995.

    Emery Harold Hall, appellant pro se. William Glenn Yarborough, III,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for appellee.
    Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to modify
    sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's order discloses that
    this appeal is without merit. As a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion, it was untimely
    filed. As a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c)(2) (1988), it has no
    merit because no relevant sentencing guideline has been reduced. Accordingly,
    we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like