Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Booker Law, III, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Booker Travis Law III's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. As unpublished opinions are not binding precedent, the court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6853

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Booker Travis Law III's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. As unpublished opinions are not binding precedent, the court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Booker Law, III, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Booker Travis Law III's motion to reduce his sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. As unpublished opinions are not binding precedent, the court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6853

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    BOOKER TRAVIS LAW, III,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (4:07-cr-00640-RBH-1)

    Submitted:

    June 14, 2012

    Decided:

    June 20, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Booker Travis Law, III, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
    Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Booker Travis Law, III, appeals the district courts
    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Law, No. 4:07-cr-00640-

    RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2012).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like