Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Barnes v. SC Dept of Transportation, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Nathaniel Barnes appealed a district court order that denied relief in his civil action against the South Carolina Department of Transportation. A panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-02-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-2141

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nathaniel Barnes appealed a district court order that denied relief in his civil action against the South Carolina Department of Transportation. A panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Barnes v. SC Dept of Transportation, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nathaniel Barnes appealed a district court order that denied relief in his civil action against the South Carolina Department of Transportation. A panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The panel affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's order. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-2141

    NATHANIEL BARNES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
    (CA-03-2296-3)

    Submitted: February 16, 2006

    Decided: February 21, 2006

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald Gist, DeAndrea Gist Benjamin, GIST LAW FIRM, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ &
    BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathaniel

    Barnes

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief in this civil action.
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See Barnes v. South Carolina Dept of Trans.,

    No. CA-03-2296-3 (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2005).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like