Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Crawford v. Crow, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Perry Crawford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John Crow, the superintendent of Lincoln Correctional Center. The district court dismissed Crawford's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court for dismissing the complaint. The appellate court also dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-08-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7254

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Perry Crawford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John Crow, the superintendent of Lincoln Correctional Center. The district court dismissed Crawford's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court for dismissing the complaint. The appellate court also dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Crawford v. Crow, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Perry Crawford filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John Crow, the superintendent of Lincoln Correctional Center. The district court dismissed Crawford's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court for dismissing the complaint. The appellate court also dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7254

    PERRY L. CRAWFORD, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN
    CROW,
    Superintendent
    Correctional Center,

    at

    Lincoln
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-05-41-1)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2006

    Decided:

    August 8, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Perry L. Crawford, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Perry L. Crawford, Sr., appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.


    (W.D.N.C. July 25, 2005).

    We have reviewed the record and

    Crawford v. Crow, No. CA-05-41-1

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like