Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Mendez, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Jaime Mendez appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Mendez a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Mendez's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6833

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jaime Mendez appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Mendez a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Mendez's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Mendez, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jaime Mendez appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Mendez a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its denial of Mendez's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6833

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JAIME MENDEZ, a/k/a Frank Quintero,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
    Chief District Judge. (CR-95-34-V, CA-98-1-5-V)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 1998

    Decided:

    October 15, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jaime Mendez, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jaime Mendez seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. United States v. Mendez, Nos. CR-95-34-V; CA-98-15-V (W.D.N.C. May 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like