Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Berg v. Fleming, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Norman Berg's § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. Berg appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's determination that Berg's complaint was frivolous. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6509

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Norman Berg's § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. Berg appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's determination that Berg's complaint was frivolous. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Berg v. Fleming, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Norman Berg's § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. Berg appealed the district court's ruling pro se. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's determination that Berg's complaint was frivolous. The appellate court therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6509

    NORMAN G. BERG,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Administrator; DAVID
    ROBINSON, Warden; GRACE SEYMOUR, Sergeant,
    Investigator; KERN GILLIAM, Business Manager,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-96-176-AM)
    Submitted:

    August 22, 1996

    Decided:

    September 4, 1996

    Before HALL, MICHAEL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Norman G. Berg, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Berg v. Fleming, No. CA-96-176-AM (E.D. Va. Feb.
    13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like