Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James Henry Miller v. United States, 840 F.2d 11, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. In less than 3 sentences, the appellate panel found the appeal lacked merit based on a review of the record and district court opinion. The panel denied the petitioner's motion to subpoena tape recordings, did not hold oral arguments, and affirmed the lower court's ruling based on its prior reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-02-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 840 F.2d 11 Docket: 87-6081

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. In less than 3 sentences, the appellate panel found the appeal lacked merit based on a review of the record and district court opinion. The panel denied the petitioner's motion to subpoena tape recordings, did not hold oral arguments, and affirmed the lower court's ruling based on its prior reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    James Henry Miller v. United States, 840 F.2d 11, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. In less than 3 sentences, the appellate panel found the appeal lacked merit based on a review of the record and district court opinion. The panel denied the petitioner's motion to subpoena tape recordings, did not hold oral arguments, and affirmed the lower court's ruling based on its prior reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    840 F.

    2d 11
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    James Henry MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 87-6081.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Oct. 26, 1987.
    Decided: Feb. 11, 1988.

    James Henry Miller, appellant pro se.


    Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
    Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL, and JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    deny Miller's motion to subpoena tape recordings, dispense with oral argument
    and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v.
    United States, C/A No. 86-619-D; Cr. No. 84-87-D (M.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 1987).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like