Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hunter v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Stephen Hunter filed a habeas corpus petition that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they denied Hunter a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-09-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6940

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Stephen Hunter filed a habeas corpus petition that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they denied Hunter a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Hunter v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Stephen Hunter filed a habeas corpus petition that was denied by the district court. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they denied Hunter a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6940

    STEPHEN HUNTER,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-99-451-7)

    Submitted:

    September 8, 1999

    Decided:

    September 21, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Stephen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant Stephen Hunter seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254
    (West 1994 & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See Hunter v. Angelone, No.

    CA-99-451-7 (W.D. Va. June 22, 1999).

    We dispense with oral argu-

    ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like