Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bradley v. Vargo, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Nelson Bradley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Bradley appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion dated February 26, 2001. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-06-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6489

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nelson Bradley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Bradley appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion dated February 26, 2001. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Bradley v. Vargo, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nelson Bradley filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several defendants which was denied by the district court. Bradley appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion dated February 26, 2001. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6489

    NELSON BRADLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOUGLAS VARGO; ALPHONSO HICKS; MARVIN LEE;
    DAVID GARRAGHTY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
    (CA-99-1230-2)

    Submitted:

    May 31, 2001

    Decided:

    June 11, 2001

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Nelson Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Nelson Bradley appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.
    Feb. 26, 2001).

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    Bradley v. Vargo, No. CA-99-1230-2 (E.D. Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like