Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Crowder, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Michael Crowder's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. It therefore denied Crowder's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral arguments would not aid its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7494

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Michael Crowder's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. It therefore denied Crowder's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral arguments would not aid its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Crowder, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Michael Crowder's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the denial. It therefore denied Crowder's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral arguments would not aid its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7494

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL CROWDER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-96-4-V, CA-01-361-3-V)

    Submitted:

    January 31, 2002

    Decided:

    February 6, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael Crowder, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Crowder seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    United States v. Crowder, Nos. CR-96-4-V; CA-01-

    361-3-V (W.D.N.C. July 19, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like