Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Walter Jacob Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider prior orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons provided by the district court in its orders denying Davis's motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6127

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Walter Jacob Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider prior orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons provided by the district court in its orders denying Davis's motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Jacob Davis appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider prior orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the reasons provided by the district court in its orders denying Davis's motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6127

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WALTER JACOB DAVIS, a/k/a Marcus Swanson,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-73-5-1-F)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2005

    Decided:

    May 25, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Walter Jacob Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Walter Jacob Davis appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to reconsider prior orders denying relief on his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (2000) motion.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See United States v. Davis, No. CA-

    94-73-5-1-F (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 20, 2004 & entered Oct. 21, 2004;
    filed Nov. 24, 2004 & entered Dec. 9, 2004).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like