Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pack v. Baltimore Police Dept, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Michael Pack filed a civil rights complaint against the Baltimore Police Department that was dismissed by the district court for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Pack's complaint did not provide sufficient facts or legal arguments to support his claims. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the case materials were adequate for their review.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1731

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Pack filed a civil rights complaint against the Baltimore Police Department that was dismissed by the district court for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Pack's complaint did not provide sufficient facts or legal arguments to support his claims. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the case materials were adequate for their review.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Pack v. Baltimore Police Dept, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Pack filed a civil rights complaint against the Baltimore Police Department that was dismissed by the district court for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Pack's complaint did not provide sufficient facts or legal arguments to support his claims. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the case materials were adequate for their review.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1731

    MICHAEL PACK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:07-cv-01703-RDB)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 15, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Pack, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Pack

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice for failing


    to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district
    courts order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district
    court.

    See Pack v. Baltimore Police Dept, No. 1:07-cv-01703-RDB

    (D. Md. July 24, 2007).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like