Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John David McClean v. Dr. Whitney Dr. Balock Dr. Smith Deborah Adles Lacy Thornburg, 37 F.3d 1494, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    John David McClean filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several doctors and medical staff which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that McClean's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-06 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 37 F.3d 1494 Docket: 93-6574

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John David McClean filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several doctors and medical staff which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that McClean's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    John David McClean v. Dr. Whitney Dr. Balock Dr. Smith Deborah Adles Lacy Thornburg, 37 F.3d 1494, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John David McClean filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several doctors and medical staff which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that McClean's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    37 F.

    3d 1494
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    John David MCCLEAN, Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    Dr. WHITNEY; Dr. Balock; Dr. Smith; Deborah Adles; Lacy
    Thornburg, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-6574.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted August 24, 1993.
    Decided October 6, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-93-148-BR)
    John David McClean, appellant pro se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM
    1

    John David McClean appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the
    district court's orders discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McClean v. Whitney, No. CA93-148-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like