Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gray v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Richard Gray filed a petition for habeas corpus relief in federal district court challenging his state conviction. 2) The district court denied relief, adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-09-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7411

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Richard Gray filed a petition for habeas corpus relief in federal district court challenging his state conviction. 2) The district court denied relief, adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Gray v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Richard Gray filed a petition for habeas corpus relief in federal district court challenging his state conviction. 2) The district court denied relief, adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, relying on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7411

    RICHARD A. GRAY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    (CA-95-273-2)
    Submitted:

    September 10, 1996

    Decided:

    September 19, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard A. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant
    Attorney General, Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1994),
    amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C.S. 2254 (Law. Co-op
    Advance Sheet June 1996). We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
    certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate.
    We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Gray
    v. Angelone, No. CA-95-273-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 1995).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like