Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Van Meter v. Van Meter, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2003. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Donald Van Meter's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Van Meter appealed the district court's ruling, but the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision to dismiss the case based on a lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-06-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-1203

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2003. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Donald Van Meter's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Van Meter appealed the district court's ruling, but the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision to dismiss the case based on a lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Van Meter v. Van Meter, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a United States Court of Appeals case from 2003. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Donald Van Meter's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Van Meter appealed the district court's ruling, but the appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision to dismiss the case based on a lack of jurisdiction. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-1203

    DONALD VAN METER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KATHERINE VAN METER; BARBARA GREIG,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CA-03-104)

    Submitted:

    June 19, 2003

    Decided:

    June 24, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald Van Meter appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    We have

    Accordingly, we
    See Van Meter v.

    Van Meter, No. CA-03-104 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 31, 2003; entered
    Feb. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like