Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Murrell Johnson's motion to reduce his sentence. Johnson had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Murrell Johnson's motion to reduce his sentence. Johnson had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony Murrell Johnson's motion to reduce his sentence. Johnson had appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, agreeing with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6863

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ANTHONY MURRELL JOHNSON, a/k/a Rock,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:92cr-00051-JFM)

    Submitted:

    August 30, 2007

    Decided:

    September 10, 2007

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Murrell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Murrell Johnson appeals the district courts
    order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18
    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2000) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a).
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See United

    States v. Johnson, No. 1:92-cr-00051-JFM (D. Md. May 24, 2007). We


    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like