Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Arena, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Stacy Lynn Arena appealed the district court's denial of her motion for modification of sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Arena's motion for modification of sentence for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6904

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stacy Lynn Arena appealed the district court's denial of her motion for modification of sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Arena's motion for modification of sentence for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Arena, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stacy Lynn Arena appealed the district court's denial of her motion for modification of sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Arena's motion for modification of sentence for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6904

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    STACY LYNN ARENA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00026-JAM-3)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2008

    Decided:

    August 11, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stacy Lynn Arena, Appellant Pro Se.


    Charles Philip Rosenberg,
    United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stacy Lynn Arena appeals the district courts order
    denying her motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A.
    3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008).
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v. Arena, No.

    4:95-cr-00026-JAM-3 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 25, 2008 and entered


    Apr. 28, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like