Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rodney Wayne Robinson v. The Hoke Correctional Institution, 77 F.3d 470, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The document is an appeals court ruling affirming the lower court's dismissal of a prisoner's civil rights lawsuit against a correctional institution. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court adopts the reasoning of the district court and dispenses with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues are adequately represented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 77 F.3d 470 Docket: 95-7777

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an appeals court ruling affirming the lower court's dismissal of a prisoner's civil rights lawsuit against a correctional institution. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court adopts the reasoning of the district court and dispenses with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues are adequately represented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Rodney Wayne Robinson v. The Hoke Correctional Institution, 77 F.3d 470, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appeals court ruling affirming the lower court's dismissal of a prisoner's civil rights lawsuit against a correctional institution. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit finds no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court adopts the reasoning of the district court and dispenses with oral argument, concluding the facts and legal issues are adequately represented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    77 F.

    3d 470

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Rodney Wayne ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    THE HOKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DefendantAppellee.
    No. 95-7777.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 7, 1996.
    Decided Feb. 26, 1996.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95895-5-BO)
    Rodney Wayne Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Robinson v. Hoke Correctional Inst., No. CA-95-895-5-BO
    (E.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like