Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stephen D. Johnson v. R. Kinard Johnson, JR., Family Court Judge, 40 F.3d 1244, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    Stephen D. Johnson filed a Section 1983 complaint against Family Court Judge R. Kinard Johnson Jr. The district court denied relief without prejudice based on the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-11-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 40 F.3d 1244 Docket: 94-6943

    Original Title

    Stephen D. Johnson v. R. Kinard Johnson, Jr., Family Court Judge, 40 F.3d 1244, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stephen D. Johnson filed a Section 1983 complaint against Family Court Judge R. Kinard Johnson Jr. The district court denied relief without prejudice based on the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Stephen D. Johnson v. R. Kinard Johnson, JR., Family Court Judge, 40 F.3d 1244, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephen D. Johnson filed a Section 1983 complaint against Family Court Judge R. Kinard Johnson Jr. The district court denied relief without prejudice based on the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    40 F.

    3d 1244

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Stephen D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    R. Kinard JOHNSON, Jr., Family Court Judge, Defendant
    Appellee.
    No. 94-6943.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
    Decided Nov. 3, 1994.

    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit


    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief without
    prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the
    magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Johnson, No. CA-941745-6-6-BC (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like