Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jarvis Junior Capps v. John Baker, 869 F.2d 593, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    Jarvis Junior Capps filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against John Baker which was denied by the district court. Capps appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Capps' appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-02-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 869 F.2d 593 Docket: 88-6852

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jarvis Junior Capps filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against John Baker which was denied by the district court. Capps appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Capps' appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Jarvis Junior Capps v. John Baker, 869 F.2d 593, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jarvis Junior Capps filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against John Baker which was denied by the district court. Capps appealed this denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Capps' appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    869 F.

    2d 593
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Jarvis Junior CAPPS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    John BAKER, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 88-6852.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 30, 1988.
    Decided: Feb. 2, 1989.

    Jarvis Junior Capps, appellant pro se.


    Before K.K. HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Jarvis Junior Capps appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Capps v. Baker, C/A No. 88-865-CRT (E.D.N.C.
    Nov. 7, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like