Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Holley v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    Garfield Holley appealed a magistrate judge's order denying his motions to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, D. Baker, and to alter or amend the final judgment in the case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no abuse of discretion, affirming the order and also denying Holley's motion for appointment of counsel. The facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6698

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Garfield Holley appealed a magistrate judge's order denying his motions to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, D. Baker, and to alter or amend the final judgment in the case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no abuse of discretion, affirming the order and also denying Holley's motion for appointment of counsel. The facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    20 views2 pages

    Holley v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Garfield Holley appealed a magistrate judge's order denying his motions to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, D. Baker, and to alter or amend the final judgment in the case. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no abuse of discretion, affirming the order and also denying Holley's motion for appointment of counsel. The facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6698

    GARFIELD WILLIAM HOLLEY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    D. BAKER, Correctional Officer, Keen Mountain
    Correctional Center,
    Defendant - Appellee,
    and
    R. A. YOUNG, Regional Director, Keen Mountain
    Correctional Center,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela M. Sargent, Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-98-643-7)

    Submitted:

    September 21, 2000

    Decided:

    September 28, 2000

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Garfield William Holley, Appellant Pro Se.


    Christopher Garrett
    Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Garfield William Holley appeals magistrate judges order denying his motions to set aside the jurys verdict in favor of Appellee and to alter or amend its final judgment.*

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no abuse of
    discretion.

    Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district

    court.

    See Holley v. Baker, No. CA-98-643-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 26,

    2000).

    We also deny Holleys motion for the appointment of coun-

    sel.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to have this matter tried by


    magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1) (1994).
    2

    You might also like