Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vernon Wayne Mauldin v. Sylvia Thibaut, Lacy Thornburg, Aaron Johnson, Nathan Rice, 809 F.2d 785, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Vernon Wayne Mauldin filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion without oral argument. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The issues had been recently and authoritatively decided, so the Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on its reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-01-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 809 F.2d 785 Docket: 86-6721

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vernon Wayne Mauldin filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion without oral argument. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The issues had been recently and authoritatively decided, so the Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Vernon Wayne Mauldin v. Sylvia Thibaut, Lacy Thornburg, Aaron Johnson, Nathan Rice, 809 F.2d 785, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vernon Wayne Mauldin filed a pro se lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion without oral argument. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The issues had been recently and authoritatively decided, so the Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    809 F.

    2d 785
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Vernon Wayne Mauldin, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Sylvia THIBAUT, Lacy Thornburg, Aaron Johnson, Nathan
    Rice,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 86-6721.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 24, 1986.
    Decided Jan. 5, 1987.

    Vernon Wayne Mauldin, appellant pro se.


    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh. John D. Larkins, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No.
    86-750-CRT).
    Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of

    the district court. Mauldin v. Thibaut, C/A No. 86-750-CRT (E.D.N.C., July
    24, 1986).
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like