Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Stoddard, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Aldeaner Lee Stoddard's appeal of a district court's denial of her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 3, 1999 ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-11-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7171

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Aldeaner Lee Stoddard's appeal of a district court's denial of her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 3, 1999 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Stoddard, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Aldeaner Lee Stoddard's appeal of a district court's denial of her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appellate court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 3, 1999 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7171

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ALDEANER LEE STODDARD,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-97-221, CA-98-3099-6-13)

    Submitted:

    October 29, 1999

    Decided:

    November 10, 1999

    Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Aldeaner Lee Stoddard, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Aldeaner Lee Stoddard seeks to appeal the district courts
    judgment denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find


    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    See United States v. Stoddard, Nos. CR-97-221; CA-98-3099-

    6-13 (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because


    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like