Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lightfoot, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    95 views2 pages
    Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Lightfoot's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7407

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Lightfoot's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    95 views2 pages

    United States v. Lightfoot, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It denied Lightfoot's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7407

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RONALDO TYNELL LIGHTFOOT, a/k/a Tynell,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CR-98-150, CA-99-705-3)

    Submitted:

    December 14, 2000

    Decided:

    December 22, 2000

    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, John
    Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronaldo Tynell Lightfoot seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Lightfoot, Nos. CR-98-

    150; CA-99-705-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2000).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like