Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Russell Smith v. Kristen Tyler, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Russell Smith filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at Eastern Correctional Institution that was denied by the district court. Smith appealed the denial as well as the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-11-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6901

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Russell Smith filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at Eastern Correctional Institution that was denied by the district court. Smith appealed the denial as well as the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views3 pages

    Russell Smith v. Kristen Tyler, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Russell Smith filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at Eastern Correctional Institution that was denied by the district court. Smith appealed the denial as well as the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6901

    RUSSELL SMITH,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    KRISTEN TYLER, Captain, State official, individually and in
    her official capacity as Captain Eastern Correctional
    Institution;
    LIEUTENANT
    CLAYTON,
    State
    official,
    individually and in his official capacity as Lieutenant
    Eastern Correctional Institution; SERGEANT COLOMA, State
    official, individually and in his official capacity as
    Sergeant Eastern Correctional Institution; OFFICER STACEY,
    State official, individually and in her official capacity as
    Correctional
    officer
    Eastern
    Correction
    Institution;
    KATHLEEN GREEN; PAUL ZIOLKOWSKI; JAMIE BALDERSON; SCOTT S.
    OAKLEY; LEONORA C. ADEGBESAN; MICHAEL J. STOUFFER; MICHAEL
    MILLER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
    Judge. (8:09-cv-01061-PJM)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2011

    Decided:

    Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    November 23, 2011

    Russell Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


    Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Russell
    denying

    relief

    Smith

    on

    his

    appeals
    42

    the

    U.S.C.

    district

    1983

    (2006)

    courts

    orders

    complaint

    and

    denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that


    judgment.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    See Smith v. Tyler, No. 8:09-cv-01061-PJM (D.

    Md. Feb. 15 & May 16, 2011).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like