Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mosley v. Olson, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Lester Brooks Mosley, III under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court dismissed Mosley's petition and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-07-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7413

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Lester Brooks Mosley, III under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court dismissed Mosley's petition and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Mosley v. Olson, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a petition filed by Lester Brooks Mosley, III under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court dismissed Mosley's petition and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7413

    LESTER BROOKS MOSLEY, III,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    KEITH OLSON, Warden,
    Institution-Beckley,

    Federal

    Correctional
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge.
    (CA-98-1115-5-P)

    Submitted:

    July 13, 2000

    Decided:

    July 19, 2000

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lester Brooks Mosley, III, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lester Brooks Mosley, III, appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994) petition.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Mosley v. Olson, No. CA-98-1115-5-P (S.D.W. Va. July 8, 1999).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like