Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Chadwick-El v. Titus, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    1) Steve Carl Chadwick-El appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Judge Roger W. Titus. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 2009 order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6121

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Steve Carl Chadwick-El appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Judge Roger W. Titus. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 2009 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Chadwick-El v. Titus, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Steve Carl Chadwick-El appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Judge Roger W. Titus. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its November 2009 order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6121

    STEVE CARL CHADWICK-EL,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    ROGER W. TITUS, U.S. District Court Judge, MD,
    Defendant Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:09-cv-02662-RDB)

    Submitted:

    June 24, 2010

    Decided:

    June 30, 2010

    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steve Carl Chadwick-El, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steve

    Carl

    Chadwick-El

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28


    U.S.C. 1915(e) (2006).
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    See Chadwick-El v. Titus, No.

    stated by the district court.

    1:09-cv-02662-RDB (D. Md. filed Nov. 4, 2009; entered Nov. 5,


    2009).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like