Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gabriel Odeghe, 45 F.3d 428, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Gabriel Odeghe appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 25, 1993 decision to deny Odeghe's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and dispensed with hearing arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-12-28 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 45 F.3d 428 Docket: 93-6838

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gabriel Odeghe appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 25, 1993 decision to deny Odeghe's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and dispensed with hearing arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    United States v. Gabriel Odeghe, 45 F.3d 428, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gabriel Odeghe appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning provided by the district court in its May 25, 1993 decision to deny Odeghe's § 2255 motion. The Fourth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not aid in the decision and dispensed with hearing arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    45 F.

    3d 428
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,


    v.
    Gabriel ODEGHE, Defendant Appellant.
    No. 93-6838.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: January 28, 1994
    Decided: December 28, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CR-9047-A, CA-91-1714-AM)
    Gabriel Odeghe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Odeghe, Nos. CR-90-47-A; CA91-1714-AM (E.D. Va. May 25, 1993). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    You might also like