Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rufus, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Michael Alonza Rufus' post-judgment motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's order denying Rufus' post-judgment motion. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7034

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Michael Alonza Rufus' post-judgment motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's order denying Rufus' post-judgment motion. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Rufus, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Michael Alonza Rufus' post-judgment motion. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the district court's order denying Rufus' post-judgment motion. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7034

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (3:02-cr-00550-MJP-1)

    Submitted:

    February 25, 2011

    Before WILKINSON and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    NIEMEYER,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    March 16, 2011

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.


    William Kenneth
    Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael

    Alonza

    Rufus

    appeals

    order denying his post-judgment motion.


    record and find no reversible error.
    district courts order.

    the

    district

    courts

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm the

    See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-

    cr-00550-MJP-1 (D.S.C. July 15, 2010).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like