Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Farrow V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Michael Anthony Farrow filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the case and found that Farrow had not actually filed the motion in the district court. As Farrow failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief, the court denied the mandamus petition. The court also granted Farrow's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-04-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1218

    Original Title

    In Re: Farrow v., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Anthony Farrow filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the case and found that Farrow had not actually filed the motion in the district court. As Farrow failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief, the court denied the mandamus petition. The court also granted Farrow's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    In Re: Farrow V., 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Anthony Farrow filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the case and found that Farrow had not actually filed the motion in the district court. As Farrow failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief, the court denied the mandamus petition. The court also granted Farrow's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1218

    In Re:

    MICHAEL ANTHONY FARROW,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-02-230)

    Submitted:

    March 10, 2004

    Decided:

    April 6, 2004

    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michael Anthony Farrow, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Anthony Farrow petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration.

    He seeks an order

    from this court directing the district court to act.

    Our review

    reveals, however, that Farrow has not filed the motion in the
    district court. Farrow has therefore failed to demonstrate that he
    is entitled to the relief sought.

    Accordingly, although we grant

    leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like