Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pigford v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Timothy and Clara Pigford appealed the denial of their Rule 60(b) motion in a case against the United States. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-05-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1976

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Timothy and Clara Pigford appealed the denial of their Rule 60(b) motion in a case against the United States. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Pigford v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy and Clara Pigford appealed the denial of their Rule 60(b) motion in a case against the United States. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1976

    TIMOTHY C. PIGFORD; CLARA B. PIGFORD,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-200-7-F)

    Submitted:

    May 15, 2003

    Decided:

    May 20, 2003

    Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Timothy C. Pigford, Clara B. Pigford, Appellants Pro Se.


    Paul
    Martin Newby, Jerri Ulrica Dunston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellants appeal the district courts order denying their
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    See Pigford v. United States, No. CA-01-

    200-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 24, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like